Reaver's Vape Blog #15: FDA Logic: Save Kids, But Screw Tax-Paying Adults?

MartinDC

"for the Ultimate VapExperience…."
Supporting Vendor
LV
9
 
Joined
21/11/16
Posts
121
Awards
12
Age
64
Location
Johannesburg South, Gauteng, South Africa
FDA Logic: Save Kids, But Screw Tax-Paying Adults? (#FacePalm)
Reposted on September 29, 2018 by:
reaversadmin
Posted in
E-Cig's, Vaping, Vaping News
By vapebeat | September 28 2018

The FDA is going bats**t crazy about vaping right now, talking about banning flavored E Juice and, more recently, a wholesale – country-wide – ban of ALL online sales for vape products.

This kind of talk, which is hopefully just posturing, is concerning for many reasons.

But, for me, the most nefarious aspect of ALL this is the power the FDA is allowed to wield over free-market economics and your lifestyle choices.

We live in a democracy. We have freedoms as individuals, and yet the FDA exists outside this, sending down its decrees from an Ivory Tower like its the 15th century and they’re bloody Pope.

This is not right. In fact, it’s downright alarming.

The current plans by the FDA for vaping are outdated, regressive, and seem hellbent on repeating the mistakes of the past – Prohibition, The Way on Drugs, etc.

ergwerwerg-1024x576.jpg


Draconian isn’t even a good enough word to describe what’s happening right now.
I only hope sense will prevail, and the FDA takes the approach of Canada and the UK, which view vaping as a key took in killing smoking.

The FDA’s current approach not only makes it look like Big Brother incarnate, but it is also totally unprecedented and completely unconstitutional.

The FDA is BIG BROTHER – And They Don’t Even Hide It…
vector-cigarette-vape-infographic-300x210.jpg



What right do THEY have to tell tax-paying adults what they can and can’t do with their bodies, money, and lifestyle?

The answer? None – they have zero right.
Big government only ends in tyranny, and the more they control what you do the more they’ll take from you.



In the UK e-cigarettes are tightly regulated for safety and quality. They aren’t completely risk free, but they carry a small fraction of the risk of cigarettes. E-cigarettes don’t produce tar or carbon monoxide, two of the most harmful elements in tobacco smoke. The liquid and vapour contain some potentially harmful chemicals also found in cigarette smoke but at much lower levels.

Public Health England’s 2015 independent evidence review found that, based on the available evidence, vaping is around 95% less harmful than smoking. The Royal College of Physicians came to a similar conclusion in its 2016 report – NHS



And it doesn’t matter if they’re doing it for “kids” or because of an “alien invasion”, letting the feds run your life is the end of the road for a free society.

If a product is legal, which vape products are, the job of the FDA is to make the case against them, based on evidence, and let the people decide for themselves.

This is how free market economics works.

And before you go assuming that I’m advocating drugs and cocaine and everything else in between, I am not – I’m talking specifically about a technology in this context that has helped millions of people kick a deadly habit into check.

Vaping Beats ALL Other Nicotine Cessation Tools (Especially Champix)
Millions of people of quit smoking because of vaping. Three, four, five packs a day habits disappeared overnight. And it happened without any help or encouragement from the feds or the FDA.

Big Pharma has tried and failed to solve the “smoking issue”, investing billions in products that simply aren’t as effective as vaping.

screen_shot_2018-03-20_at_16.55.00.png


And now, because of some bunk science about kids vaping, the FDA wants to curtail ALL of this progress?

No other product has EVER done this.

Not nicotine patches, not nicotine gum, and certainly not that god-awful Champix substance, which has been linked to some horrible things, including suicide, of all things!

On Thursday in Brisbane magistrates court, coroner John Hutton found that a commonly prescribed drug named Champix – manufactured by Pfizer and sold internationally under the name Chantix – contributed to the death of a 22-year-old Brisbane man, Timothy John, who died by suicide soon after he began taking a medication that he had hoped would cut his smoking habit from eight cigarettes a day down to zero – The Guardian.

Carpet bans on products is a slippery slope, once they get one thing banned the contagion spreads and before you know it the country has descended into something that resembles East Germany circa 1970.

But the key points here are this:

  • Vaping is 95% safer than smoking.
  • The vaping industry has created jobs and billions in taxable revenue.
  • Vaping is ILLEGAL for minors
  • Vaping has helped MILLIONS quit decades-long smoking habits
A ban on Internet sales of vape products would undo ALL the hard work done by thousands of retailers, manufacturers, and advocates over the past 10 years.

And it’d do it in a heartbeat, overnight.

Screen-Shot-2018-09-28-at-11.47.52-300x186.png


Why? Simple: it would disseminate the industry in the US, millions and millions of dollars would be lost, businesses would close, hundreds of thousands of jobs lost.

And for what?

Because a few kids have tried vaping? Last time I checked, millions of kids had tried alcohol and smoked cigarettes.

Billions throughout history, in fact.

I was a kid once, I did both.

I just wish vaping had been around then, so I would never have tried a cigarette in the first place.

What Is The FDA’s “REAL” Agenda With Vaping Regulation?
But the darker undertones of this “push” by the FDA are way more concerning than mere bans or its pontificating about caring about the publics’ health. It smacks of an agenda, hidden yet extremely palpable.

It also smacks of corporatism, a thing favored by the Nazis in Germany during the 1940s, whereby the state worked in cahoots with its buddies (Big Pharma, Big Tobacco, in this context) to crush technologies/ideas/principles it could not control (or get a sizeable piece of).

The pharmaceutical industry has leveraged public policy to its benefit, prohibiting the federal government from discounts on drug prices through bulk purchases while using the tax code to develop Patient Assistance Foundations to claim charitable contributions as well as justifying moving income overseas to reduce tax liability. Consumers and taxpayers are left covering the costs of Big Pharma’s corporatism. Regulatory reforms are proposed to make drug companies more socially responsible – Ethical Human Psychology And Psychiatry

Whatever happens, as a vaper and an advocate, you need to do your bit to stop this undemocratic, unelected, Maoist organization from killing off of the only technology that has ever made smoking redundant and less prevalent in society.

If you’re in the USA, join the following action groups:

Searched the internet no specific hits found!....
Results received when searching all forums on ECIGGSA!....

upload_2018-9-29_12-42-17.png

If you’re in the RSA, join the following action group:
NCAS Petition

If you are Registered or are a Member of any other specific Vape Action Group in the RSA? PLEASE be so kind as to confirm the name of the action group and insert the associated link/s on ECIGSSA, so that we can get involved.......
 
Last edited:
NCAS Campaign

Dear Forumites,

I just signed the campaign: Ease the burden on our health system, increase the tobacco tax

It would mean the world to me if you could also add your name to this important issue. Every name that is added builds momentum around the campaign and makes it more likely for us to get the change we want to see.

Will you join me by taking action on this campaign?

https://awethu.amandla.mobi/petitions/ease-the-burden-on-our-health-system-increase-the-tobacco-tax

After you've signed the petition please also take a moment to share it with others. It's super easy – all you need to do is forward this email.

Thank you!

MartinDC
 
NCAS Campaign

Dear Forumites,

I just signed the campaign: Ease the burden on our health system, increase the tobacco tax

It would mean the world to me if you could also add your name to this important issue. Every name that is added builds momentum around the campaign and makes it more likely for us to get the change we want to see.

Will you join me by taking action on this campaign?

https://awethu.amandla.mobi/petitions/ease-the-burden-on-our-health-system-increase-the-tobacco-tax

After you've signed the petition please also take a moment to share it with others. It's super easy – all you need to do is forward this email.

Thank you!

MartinDC
 
Repost of last years article on:
"Regulatory confusion regarding e-cigarettes & vaping will be resolved"
by: as posted on the 9 Nov. 2017 in:
upload_2018-10-7_12-19-32.png

Home » Health & Pharmaceutical Law » Regulatory confusion regarding e-cigarettes & vaping will be resolved

Regulatory confusion regarding e-cigarettes & vaping will be resolved
E-Cig.jpg

By Vapour Product Association

Topics Health & Pharmaceutical Law
09 Nov 2017


Confusion continues to surround legislation regarding e-cigarettes and vaping. But, as more organisations publish findings regarding the use of vaping to reduce tobacco smoking and its health risks, so the regulatory tide is beginning to turn, says South Africa’s Vapour Product Association (VPA).

The irony surrounding the categorisation of e-cigarettes and vaping is that both electronic devices and vapours-which contain varying levels of nicotine – are treated as tobacco products, although they contain no tobacco at all.

“In fact,” says Kabir Kaleechurn, Director of the VPA, “the two smoking processes are different. Tobacco smoking relies on burning of tobacco, the cause of all cigarette-smoking health risks while vaping relies on a gentle heating process to deliver its nicotine. It is probably the word ‘cigarette’ used for both products that is causing legislative confusion,” he says.

“In many countries, the legislation places e-cigarettes in the same category as tobacco. In South Africa, e-cigarettes are not covered by the Tobacco Products Control Act, or by the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act. It seems that the act of combustion and smoke preclude e-cigarettes being regarded as cigarettes. They also do not fall under the Medicines Act as they are marketed solely for recreational purposes.”

Whilst e-cigarettes and vaping presently fall into the gap between smoking and medicinal legislation in South Africa, there have been calls locally for it to be classified under both sets of legislation. Protagonists for this viewpoint feel that it should be regarded as a medical treatment, with ‘other’ consumption falling under the Tobacco Act because it ‘should be regarded as a health risk like all tobacco products’.

In the VPA’s view, this is contradictory. Authorities internationally are stating that vaping is reducing smoking by active tobacco smokers. Vaping is also weaning people off tobacco smoking by still offering the hit experienced by nicotine – medically regarded as the least dangerous of the all the substances found in tobacco cigarettes according to 2017 May report entitled ‘Where there’s no smoke, is there still fire? ethical aspects of tobacco harm reduction ‘published by the Africa Harm Reduction Alliance (AHRA).

“The Vaping Industry needs to be considered as a partner to the Health agenda in South Africa, should all smokers move to harm reduced vaping products the impact is bound to be extremely positive from a Non-communicable diseases point of view. It is our duty to ensure that we provide a safer alternative to the millions of smokers in the country” he says.

In South Africa, members of the VPA have responded to the legislative situation by adhering to their own code of conduct. We voluntarily have committed ourselves to not selling the product to and by people under the age of 18.

“In the meantime,” says Kaleechurn, “South Africa is not alone. In the UK, e-cigarettes may be brought to market as either medicines or consumer products. Those wanting medicines approval to undergo the standard licensing process; Norway makes provision for vaping devices to be classified as either medicinal products or tobacco surrogates. France has allowed e-cigarettes to be marketed as medicines and consumer products.”

In the United States, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regards e-cigarettes and other electronic delivery systems as tobacco products, except in cases where they are ‘marketed as drugs, devices or combination products’.

However, now under the leadership of Dr Scott Gottlieb, the FDA appears to be moving towards regulatory changes that are designed to move smokers towards e-cigarettes. The Reuters news agency (July 17, 2017) said the government proposed cutting nicotine in cigarettes to ‘non-addictive’ levels.

The FDA cannot reduce nicotine levels to zero, nor can it ban cigarettes. But Gottlieb said the agency would study regulating nicotine levels with a view toward the “FDA’s potential to render cigarettes minimally addictive or non-addictive.”

“Nicotine itself is not responsible for cancer, lung disease and heart disease that kill hundreds of thousands of Americans each year,” he said. “It’s the other chemical compounds in tobacco and in the smoke created by setting tobacco on fire that directly causes illness and death.” Analysts said they expect regulators in Europe to study similar actions on nicotine products.

The action shakes up a debate among public health advocates as to whether e-cigarettes represent a health risk or potential benefit. “While there’s still much research to be done on these products and the risks that they may pose, they may also present benefits that we must consider,” Gottlieb said.

During an April hearing on whether to advance his nomination for the FDA position, he said some e-cigarettes may have the potential to wean smokers off combustible cigarettes and be less harmful.

“As the debate on legislation continues, so more medical research is being released on the benefits of e-cigarettes and vaping. Anti-smoking bodies and medical bodies such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) have entered the debate with positive findings on vaping and the role it plays in reducing risk within the smoking community.”

It may take time, but it is inevitable that as the body of available research increases, so legislators will begin to review their stance on vaping. Organisations like the VPA are committed to supplying information available, while ethically serving the market,” says Kaleechurn.

See also:

(This article is provided for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. For more information on the topic, please contact the author/s or the relevant provider.)
 
Back
Top