Posted on FB by Konstantinos Farsalinos and the link is supplied by him. It makes for very interesting reading. What it essentially says is that if lockdown is instituted too soon and for a long time, post-lockdown will be worse, because the population has not built up immunity.
Konstantinos Farsalinos
Yesterday at 5:02 PM ·
For those interested, here is the Harvard study on the course of the epidemic and social detachment measures. It is impressive what it says, that the harder and successful measures you take in the beginning, the worse and bigger the next wave will be (if you do not take measures).
To make it clear that this does not mean that the first stage lock down is wrong. What they say is the natural consequence of the fact that a very successful first stage means that almost the entire population is epínosos (that is sensitive to the virus). The Overall and in-depth treatment of the epidemic is a serious and difficult balance exercise...
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42638988/Social%20distancing%20strategies%20for%20curbing%20the%20COVID-19%20epidemic.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Konstantinos Farsalinos
Yesterday at 5:02 PM ·
For those interested, here is the Harvard study on the course of the epidemic and social detachment measures. It is impressive what it says, that the harder and successful measures you take in the beginning, the worse and bigger the next wave will be (if you do not take measures).
To make it clear that this does not mean that the first stage lock down is wrong. What they say is the natural consequence of the fact that a very successful first stage means that almost the entire population is epínosos (that is sensitive to the virus). The Overall and in-depth treatment of the epidemic is a serious and difficult balance exercise...
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42638988/Social%20distancing%20strategies%20for%20curbing%20the%20COVID-19%20epidemic.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y