Trump and Vaping

YeOldeOke

Elite Vaper
Supporting Vendor
LV
32
 
Joined
25/3/16
Posts
1,751
Awards
28
Age
72
Location
Pretoria
'When America sneezes the world catches a cold.'

I have not seen any discussion here, or anywhere for that matter, on how the election of Trump is likely to affect the vaping industry (not interested in a political discussion). My feeling is that it is a very positive development for the vaping industry.

A very simple argument to be made in light of jobs. Vaping = far safer than smoking. Vaping creates many jobs in SME's. FDA regs will kill the industry. Reminder: every new reg should be accompanied by the scrapping of 2.

I'm optimistic.



Vape companies try to galvanize Trump administration to ease FDA rules

As tobacco and vaping companies focus on new smoking products that are potentially less harmful, the industry sees an opening for rolling back rules on these products under the Trump administration.

Donald Trump’s surprise election victory in November, and his pledges to reduce federal regulations on business, led tobacco lobby groups to draft a new plan of action, according to company executives, lobbyists and consultants interviewed by Reuters.


The immediate goal is to delay implementation of new regulations on the latest generation of e-cigarettes and other vaping devices, which produce a vapor from liquid nicotine rather than burning tobacco.

Longer-term, they are setting their sights on repealing the 2016 law that treats these devices like cigarettes.

Lobbyists describe a cautious optimism as they approach lawmakers with their plans for products that they say can help traditional smokers quit and avoid the known dangers of tobacco. With U.S. sales of conventional cigarettes shrinking, Big Tobacco has made a major bet in recent years to dominate the e-cigarette industry.


....

“There is a much higher level of hope and a general belief that a new administration would be willing to take a new look and consider a harm reduction rather than abstinence only approach to nicotine,” said Michael Hogan, a lobbyist who represents the vaping industry at the Alpine Group.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tobacco-vape-idUSKBN1522WU
 
Last edited:
As you rightly state, this is not the place for a political discussion outside of how it affects vaping; as this forum is about vaping and pro / anti Trump arguments might be very polarising here. However, I do think that any speculation on President Trump's potential stance towards vaping would be unavoidably somewhat coloured by one's general views on Trump's political strategies, so I do apologise that my speculation is clearly not politically neutral.

Firstly, Trump has made it quite clear that he has no qualms collaborating with and most likely expanding any major industries that are considered harmful by the 'consensus view' (such as the fossil fuel industry), if short term economic gains for the U.S.A. are thereby to be made. Severely curtailing the tobacco industry (I do not mean by further restrictions and legislation on smoking, but rather by the free expanse of vaping and the corresponding decline of smoking) in the interest of public health would not fall within this logic. Yes - tobacco-related diseases does place a massive cost burden on the long term health budget. However, this is a long-term (exceeding the range of two presidential terms) concern and Tom Price has 'admitted' in his hearings that the plans are to cut spending on Medicare and Medicaid by more than a trillion dollars over the next decade in any case.

Lastly, it is up to one's own discretion to believe whether Price, the nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services, was indeed unaware that he had stocks in Philip Morris or not: http://freebeacon.com/politics/al-franken-criticizes-tom-price-holding-tobacco-stocks-he-owns-too/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top