Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'm also at Liberty and will definitely want to look at this in the future. I do know that once you declare yourself to be a non-smoker and they've confirmed that with nicotine tests, you are an official non-smoker for the remaining of your life according to Liberty. This sound counter-intuitive but it's true, you can trust me.
Conclusion: Vape 0mg nic for 2 months or so (not sure how long it takes for nic to clear sufficiently from your system) then revert back.
Edit: This is not being dishonest. Discuss it with them freely.
Once you declare yourself as a non-smoker and something were to happen to you they will perform a tox screen to check for any toxins in your body such as alcohol and nicotine.
If nicotine is found in your system after being declared as a non-smoker they will further test to see if it could be related to second hand smoke. If they cannot link it to being related to second hand smoke then your policy might be considered as breach in contract and they won't payout.
Hi BhavZ. That does seem the logical way of approaching this situation.
At the time you write up your life insurance you have to declare your medical situation (smoker, epilepsy ect). They will confirm this with tests. If afterwards you've quit smoking or are not obese any more for instance, you may request a reevaluation because your risks will be lower.
If after you're time of write up you develop epilepsy, your monthly payment won't increase and if you die because of it they pay out the full amount because at the time of write up you were a lesser risk.
They treat smoking in the exact same light. So what I said above it valid. It's a loophole but not dishonest and widely used. I've just confirmed this with a Liberty consultant. I cannot speak for other companies.
Thanks for the info @Reinvanhardt
I am just cautious of the fine print in things like this because they are a business after all and if they can save by not paying out then they would imo, as is the case with any other business out there.
Cool, will give it a look as well and see with my current setupWhat you say makes sense and I too would feel sceptical about this if it weren't for the huge amount of trust I have in the knowledge and integrity of said consultant.
Cool, will give it a look as well and see with my current setup
No hope for me at this stage then; move between 24mg & 18mg depending on the flavour.
I suggest the jury investigate this and fine the guy who changed names without any consent ! it should be all lower case like johan