Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Dont think they loath to do it but rather just go where the current demand is.
I'll stick with my Mölly but the advantage Vandy has over the others is the price factor they prop will come in far lower than and more inline with the likes of the RAM and such.
But I do agree would be cool to see small form factor regulated devices, Iv got a BF on order with @kimbo so that will be my first regulated BF.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The vaping industry runs from one trend to the next. Currently mech squonkers are "it" so that's what everyone is producing. If the trend moves to regulated squonkers then we'll be spoilt for choice.Looks promising although the lack of a screen would indicate that it's yet another unregulated squonker in an increasingly crowded market. Is there something about putting a regulated chip in a squonker that is breathtakingly difficult or expensive to achieve? Kanger did it - and cheaply too - with the Dripbox 2. It completely fuddles my brain that other manufacturers seem loath to do it.
R1450 at TheEcigStore.Are mech squonkers "it" because consumers prefer them or because sub-R1000 regulated squonkers are almost non-existent? From what I've heard and seen, the VT Inbox is the most popular squonker atm. But... it's R1700. Sub-R1000, your choices are the dated and hard-to-find Kanger Dripbox 2, the Squeeze and the Coppervape. If Eleaf brought out a Squeeze with VW output of 10-60W and a screen, I wonder how many people would buy the unregulated version? I certainly wouldn't have.
What is the advantage of squonking on a mech? There isn't one as far as I can tell. You have to build for your power draw which is a pain, and the battery starts going flat quite quickly, resulting in a successively weaker vape with each pull. I have an unregulated squonker in the Squeeze. Eleaf should not assume from it that I prefer mechs. I'd vastly prefer a regulated squonker. But I'm not paying R1700 for the cheapest one.
Yeah, there's definitely a shortage of affordable regulated squonkers. A gap in the market maybe?Are mech squonkers "it" because consumers prefer them or because sub-R1000 regulated squonkers are almost non-existent? From what I've heard and seen, the VT Inbox is the most popular squonker atm. But... it's R1700. Sub-R1000, your choices are the dated and hard-to-find Kanger Dripbox 2, the Squeeze and the Coppervape. If Eleaf brought out a Squeeze with VW output of 10-60W and a screen, I wonder how many people would buy the unregulated version? I certainly wouldn't have.
What is the advantage of squonking on a mech? There isn't one as far as I can tell. You have to build for your power draw which is a pain, and the battery starts going flat quite quickly, resulting in a successively weaker vape with each pull. I have an unregulated squonker in the Squeeze. Eleaf should not assume from it that I prefer mechs. I'd vastly prefer a regulated squonker. But I'm not paying R1700 for the cheapest one.
Looks promising although the lack of a screen would indicate that it's yet another unregulated squonker in an increasingly crowded market. Is there something about putting a regulated chip in a squonker that is breathtakingly difficult or expensive to achieve? Kanger did it - and cheaply too - with the Dripbox 2. It completely fuddles my brain that other manufacturers seem loath to do it.
I'm trying to remain diplomatic and politically correct here but as some wealthy oke once said, there is one born every minute... Hence the supply...This is the part I don't get. You can buy a very decently made dual cell 200W regulated mod (Smoant Battlestar, Charon, Joyetech Primo, etc) for well under a grand. The worst, cheapest, plastic 3D mech squonker is over a grand. What justifies the cost? Adding a $1 bottle into the kit?