Chalice Clone Comparison

Andre

Reonaut
VIP
LV
62
 
Joined
6/10/13
Posts
20,033
Awards
48
Location
Koringberg
For my authentic Chalice III, imported directly from the Marks Bugs, I paid R1833.00 (all included).
You can buy the clone from @kimbo for R320.00 (shipping excluded).
So, expect no mercy from my side!

The clone was provided free or charge for this exercise. As far as I know, this is one of very few atomizers developed for bottom feed specifically.

The clone is on the left. Even the indentation on the box covers are the same! Very difficult to tell the two apart. The top of the drip tip of the real McCoy is rounded. The finish (colour) on the bottom part of the clone differs slightly from the top part or the clone. The engraving of the logo on the clone is a bit shallower than on the real thing. The threading on the clone is very smooth. Does, however, feels just a bit tinny in comparison when screwing the top cap on - maybe the metal is a micron or so thinner. The clone looks a bit taller on the 2nd picture below - I neglected to insert the drip tip fully:doh:.

12rgwQd.jpg


m3EV83P.jpg


The bf hole part on the authentic looks a better quality job than on the clone.

EAH8dl8.jpg


Here you can see the drip tip difference better. The rounded top of the authentic is slightly more comfortable on the lips.

HPe3ENj.jpg


To eliminate any unfair advantage, both units were cleaned in the UV bath. To avoid any confusion on my part I used the bottom of a herb infuser for one unit.

fssNzuu.jpg


Broken down in their component parts. As close to 1:1 as you can get.

QPF0LZp.jpg


I marked the position of the internal (2 mm) air hole on the outside of the top cap. Then the position of the coil was marked on the bottom part. As you can see the air hole did not line up with the coil position. With some apprehension I followed the procedure outlined by @Xhale here. And, to my astonishment, I got it right. In the second picture you can see that line-up was attained!

wZ7CDV6.jpg


okWzuTF.jpg


All in all, a great clone. Of course, the proof is in the vape! Coiled them both with 5 wraps of 27 g Kanthal A1 on a 2.5 mm ID mandrel. Resistance measured at 0.77 and 0.78 ohms respectively. I find the Chalice very easy to coil.

Gu1zTM9.jpg


Wicked with 3 mm Ceramic. Clone on the right from here.

iKsdPEd.jpg


The two Reo Minis are ready for the ultimate test. Both loaded with a layered juice well known to me - Thenancara Shinshiro.

tMQBugZ.jpg


Identical and awesome vape. I could detect no difference at all after 12 hours of vaping both. The flavour from the Chalice III is the most accurate I have encountered in any of the atomizers I have owned. Throat hit is substantial. Clouds are satisfactory.

The Chalice is known as a mouth to lung atty, but I have come across reports of peeps doing direct to lung hits too. Tried it, very easily accomplished, but I prefer mouth to lung on all atomizers.

Tried the same juice on a stock air hole Reomizer 2. For me the flavour on the Chalice is better, not by much, but discernible. The air flow control on the Chalice makes it more flexible than the RM2. And the Chalice is far prettier than the RM2 imo. The Chalice also fits the standard profile Reos.

Conclusion:
This is a high quality clone, both from a material and vape perspective. Pity about the air hole alignment, but relatively easily fixed. Of course, the quality of the material used will be tested and evaluated over time. Will report here if anything goes awry.

At R320.00 this is the least expensive of all the bottom fed atomizers I know of. It is an absolute bargain at that price. If you do not object to clones in principle, there is absolutely no reason to buy the extremely expensive authentic Chalice.

A must for all bottom fed aficionados!
O0EBHxt.jpg

EDIT: Have now received 2 reports of this clone shorting (with and without a coil in there) and collapsing the Reo spring. Might be a center pin problem. Just a heads up.

@kimbo says he is now checking all to make sure they are fine. He is also aligning all the air holes in his remaining stock.

EDIT: Some reports of the posts of the clone rusting.
 
Last edited:
Really complete and in-depth and fair review and without the lunatic fringe emotion that I may have shown had I done it. Good one @Andre! No doubt that @kimbo will be out of stock shortly! ;-)
 
For my authentic Chalice III, imported directly from the Marks Bugs, I paid R1833.00 (all included).
You can buy the clone from @kimbo for R320.00 (shipping excluded).
So, expect no mercy from my side!

The clone was provided free or charge for this exercise. As far as I know, this is one of very few atomizers developed for bottom feed specifically.

The clone is on the left. Even the indentation on the box covers are the same! Very difficult to tell the two apart. The top of the drip tip of the real McCoy is rounded. The finish (colour) on the bottom part of the clone differs slightly from the top part or the clone. The engraving of the logo on the clone is a bit shallower than on the real thing. The threading on the clone is very smooth. Does, however, feels just a bit tinny in comparison when screwing the top cap on - maybe the metal is a micron or so thinner. The clone looks a bit taller on the 2nd picture below - I neglected to insert the drip tip fully:doh:.

12rgwQd.jpg


m3EV83P.jpg


The bf hole part on the authentic looks a better quality job than on the clone.

EAH8dl8.jpg


Here you can see the drip tip difference better. The rounded top of the authentic is slightly more comfortable on the lips.

HPe3ENj.jpg


To eliminate any unfair advantage, both units were cleaned in the UV bath. To avoid any confusion on my part I used the bottom of a herb infuser for one unit.

fssNzuu.jpg


Broken down in their component parts. As close to 1:1 as you can get.

QPF0LZp.jpg


I marked the position of the internal (2 mm) air hole on the outside of the top cap. Then the position of the coil was marked on the bottom part. As you can see the air hole did not line up with the coil position. With some apprehension I followed the procedure outlined by @Xhale here. And, to my astonishment, I got it right. In the second picture you can see that line-up was attained!

wZ7CDV6.jpg


okWzuTF.jpg


All in all, a great clone. Of course, the proof is in the vape! Coiled them both with 5 wraps of 27 g Kanthal A1 on a 2.5 mm ID mandrel. Resistance measured at 0.77 and 0.78 ohms respectively. I find the Chalice very easy to coil.

Gu1zTM9.jpg


Wicked with 3 mm Ceramic. Clone on the right from here.

iKsdPEd.jpg


The two Reo Minis are ready for the ultimate test. Both loaded with a layered juice well known to me - Thenancara Shinshiro.

tMQBugZ.jpg


Identical and awesome vape. I could detect no difference at all after 12 hours of vaping both. The flavour from the Chalice III is the most accurate I have encountered in any of the atomizers I have owned. Throat hit is substantial. Clouds are satisfactory.

The Chalice is known as a mouth to lung atty, but I have come across reports of peeps doing direct to lung hits too. Tried it, very easily accomplished, but I prefer mouth to lung on all atomizers.

Tried the same juice on a stock air hole Reomizer 2. For me the flavour on the Chalice is better, not by much, but discernible. The air flow control on the Chalice makes it more flexible than the RM2. And the Chalice is far prettier than the RM2 imo. The Chalice also fits the standard profile Reos.

Conclusion:
This is a high quality clone, both from a material and vape perspective. Pity about the air hole alignment, but relatively easily fixed. Of course, the quality of the material used will be tested and evaluated over time. Will report here if anything goes awry.

At R320.00 this is the least expensive of all the bottom fed atomizers I know of. It is an absolute bargain at that price. If you do not object to clones in principle, there is absolutely no reason to buy the extremely expensive authentic Chalice.

A must for all bottom fed aficionados!
O0EBHxt.jpg
Thank you @Andre. I had to move my air hole as well but as you saw it is quite easy. Thank you again for your thorough inspection of the clone and comparing it to the authentic.
 
Last edited:
thank you for tagging me...I've had the chalice back in the box because it was such a small chamber that I really couldnt prevent the cotton from burning right through the middle using microcoils. Maybe my drags are too long....anyway, just took it out and rewicked it like you with voodoowool and giving it another go.
Also, on receipt , my chalice was missing the oring that stops the air control moving freely..I realised this and put one on from a box of spares, but it is worth checking if you have one..the air control should move, but with difficulty. If you can spin it like a yo-yo then you are missing an oring
 
Excellent review. Helped me make up my mind as to weather I want an MTL atty after selling my RM2 and stil having the Cyclops. At the price and with this review, seems this might be worth having for those odd days when I want a change or need to go in stealth mode.
 
Excellent comparison review @andre:clap:

I am even more stoked to get mine now, thank you :dance:
 
@Andre, thank you for a well written, unbiased review. Much appreciated I was hesitating to get the clone. I have just ordered two to share the load with my RM2.
 
thank you for tagging me...I've had the chalice back in the box because it was such a small chamber that I really couldnt prevent the cotton from burning right through the middle using microcoils. Maybe my drags are too long....anyway, just took it out and rewicked it like you with voodoowool and giving it another go.
Also, on receipt , my chalice was missing the oring that stops the air control moving freely..I realised this and put one on from a box of spares, but it is worth checking if you have one..the air control should move, but with difficulty. If you can spin it like a yo-yo then you are missing an oring
Let us know your experience with the voodoowool. Thanks for the tip on the little o-ring. Thankfully mine was present. Thanks most of all for the procedure to align the air hole - without it I would have been lost.
 
Thanks for the really great review, and the awesome photo's @Andre
 
excellent comparison love all the pictures. i will add one to my list for next month
 
Fabulous @Andre!!

Not just the detailed pics but the side by side vape with identical setups and juice

Does not get more professional than that!
 
For my authentic Chalice III, imported directly from the Marks Bugs, I paid R1833.00 (all included).
You can buy the clone from @kimbo for R320.00 (shipping excluded).
So, expect no mercy from my side!

The clone was provided free or charge for this exercise. As far as I know, this is one of very few atomizers developed for bottom feed specifically.

The clone is on the left. Even the indentation on the box covers are the same! Very difficult to tell the two apart. The top of the drip tip of the real McCoy is rounded. The finish (colour) on the bottom part of the clone differs slightly from the top part or the clone. The engraving of the logo on the clone is a bit shallower than on the real thing. The threading on the clone is very smooth. Does, however, feels just a bit tinny in comparison when screwing the top cap on - maybe the metal is a micron or so thinner. The clone looks a bit taller on the 2nd picture below - I neglected to insert the drip tip fully:doh:.

12rgwQd.jpg


m3EV83P.jpg


The bf hole part on the authentic looks a better quality job than on the clone.

EAH8dl8.jpg


Here you can see the drip tip difference better. The rounded top of the authentic is slightly more comfortable on the lips.

HPe3ENj.jpg


To eliminate any unfair advantage, both units were cleaned in the UV bath. To avoid any confusion on my part I used the bottom of a herb infuser for one unit.

fssNzuu.jpg


Broken down in their component parts. As close to 1:1 as you can get.

QPF0LZp.jpg


I marked the position of the internal (2 mm) air hole on the outside of the top cap. Then the position of the coil was marked on the bottom part. As you can see the air hole did not line up with the coil position. With some apprehension I followed the procedure outlined by @Xhale here. And, to my astonishment, I got it right. In the second picture you can see that line-up was attained!

wZ7CDV6.jpg


okWzuTF.jpg


All in all, a great clone. Of course, the proof is in the vape! Coiled them both with 5 wraps of 27 g Kanthal A1 on a 2.5 mm ID mandrel. Resistance measured at 0.77 and 0.78 ohms respectively. I find the Chalice very easy to coil.

Gu1zTM9.jpg


Wicked with 3 mm Ceramic. Clone on the right from here.

iKsdPEd.jpg


The two Reo Minis are ready for the ultimate test. Both loaded with a layered juice well known to me - Thenancara Shinshiro.

tMQBugZ.jpg


Identical and awesome vape. I could detect no difference at all after 12 hours of vaping both. The flavour from the Chalice III is the most accurate I have encountered in any of the atomizers I have owned. Throat hit is substantial. Clouds are satisfactory.

The Chalice is known as a mouth to lung atty, but I have come across reports of peeps doing direct to lung hits too. Tried it, very easily accomplished, but I prefer mouth to lung on all atomizers.

Tried the same juice on a stock air hole Reomizer 2. For me the flavour on the Chalice is better, not by much, but discernible. The air flow control on the Chalice makes it more flexible than the RM2. And the Chalice is far prettier than the RM2 imo. The Chalice also fits the standard profile Reos.

Conclusion:
This is a high quality clone, both from a material and vape perspective. Pity about the air hole alignment, but relatively easily fixed. Of course, the quality of the material used will be tested and evaluated over time. Will report here if anything goes awry.

At R320.00 this is the least expensive of all the bottom fed atomizers I know of. It is an absolute bargain at that price. If you do not object to clones in principle, there is absolutely no reason to buy the extremely expensive authentic Chalice.

A must for all bottom fed aficionados!
O0EBHxt.jpg
Glad to hear this as I've just ordered the clone. Great job!
 
Excellent review. Thanks Andre for putting in the time to do this review. I have also ordered one from @kimbo.
 
Just a word of caution to the new Chalice owners in the form of a post from ECF:

I haven't seen a clone Chalice - but in the real one, several people accidentally collapsed their springs with a short because the deck is SO TINY that the coil - or the end of a wire coming off a post - touched the cap for a short.
Therefore, with a Chalice, you want to test the resistance AGAIN with the CAP ON before you put it on your Reo and fire.
Hopefully, that's it - as it's preventable - and not some other flaw within the atty...it is a low-priced clone...there could be another issue. But if it tested OK when you built it, then shorted with the cap on - that's why - check the wire ends!!
 
Just a word of caution to the new Chalice owners in the form of a post from ECF:

I haven't seen a clone Chalice - but in the real one, several people accidentally collapsed their springs with a short because the deck is SO TINY that the coil - or the end of a wire coming off a post - touched the cap for a short.
Therefore, with a Chalice, you want to test the resistance AGAIN with the CAP ON before you put it on your Reo and fire.
Hopefully, that's it - as it's preventable - and not some other flaw within the atty...it is a low-priced clone...there could be another issue. But if it tested OK when you built it, then shorted with the cap on - that's why - check the wire ends!!
Thank you @Andre It happened to me :(
 
Just a word of caution to the new Chalice owners in the form of a post from ECF:

I haven't seen a clone Chalice - but in the real one, several people accidentally collapsed their springs with a short because the deck is SO TINY that the coil - or the end of a wire coming off a post - touched the cap for a short.
Therefore, with a Chalice, you want to test the resistance AGAIN with the CAP ON before you put it on your Reo and fire.
Hopefully, that's it - as it's preventable - and not some other flaw within the atty...it is a low-priced clone...there could be another issue. But if it tested OK when you built it, then shorted with the cap on - that's why - check the wire ends!!
Thanks for the heads up.Fortunately (or unfortunately ) I've some practice at building on other miniscule rta decks.
 
Have edited the OP as follows:

Have now received 2 reports of this clone shorting (with and without a coil in there) and collapsing the Reo spring. Might be a center pin problem. Just a heads up.
 
Have edited the OP as follows:

Have now received 2 reports of this clone shorting (with and without a coil in there) and collapsing the Reo spring. Might be a center pin problem. Just a heads up.
@Andre after the first report i check everyone to make sure all screws and o-rings are there and that they dont short with no coil in them
 
@kimbo. Can you please tell is how many and where the o rings should be?
 
Back
Top