Why is it necessary to have a groove on both sides? Won't the one groove feed both wicks should you do duals?well done looks awesome. did you slot both sides?
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk HD
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why is it necessary to have a groove on both sides? Won't the one groove feed both wicks should you do duals?well done looks awesome. did you slot both sides?
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk HD
You did that by hand with a file? Wow, awesome.
dual channels drains better for dual coils. single channel will 1st feed the wick itns facing then move to other sideWhy is it necessary to have a groove on both sides? Won't the one groove feed both wicks should you do duals?
I am wondering whether it would make much of a difference in practice. My Cyclone only has one juice hole on the side and it feeds the wicks on my dual coils perfectly. The juice covers the whole of the deck and rising when squonking. Maybe @Alex could try duals on his and report back to us?dual channels drains better for dual coils. single channel will 1st feed the wick itns facing then move to other side
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk HD
I am wondering whether it would make much of a difference in practice. My Cyclone only has one juice hole on the side and it feeds the wicks on my dual coils perfectly. The juice covers the whole of the deck and rising when squonking. Maybe @Alex could try duals on his and report back to us?
Great, thank you for informing us.Although it was juicing ok with one channel, I decided to just do the other side as well. This is a much better solution for two coils. One squonk and it fills up like a boss.
Only need to grind this section for the other side.
and when I built single coils I just plugged the other sideAlthough it was juicing ok with one channel, I decided to just do the other side as well. This is a much better solution for two coils. One squonk and it fills up like a boss.
Only need to grind this section for the other side.
Awesome. Please show us a picture of the deck where you have done the juice hole. What size drill bit did you use?Being the modders that's in me, I couldn't leave the Atomic alone that I got from @thekeeperza
So I convinced the old man at work to do me another favour.
Here its in and prepped for surgery.
All done and dusted.
Me bottom feed dual coil Atomic ready for action on the REO.
This thing kicks like a mule!
I have to take short puffs.
Its epic! Ha ha
Thanks for moving to the correct thread.Awesome. Please show us a picture of the deck where you have done the juice hole. What size drill bit did you use?
Go Oom @Andre for a self proclaimed non diy guy you doing very well. I'm impressed sir.QUASAR modded to bottom fed. Removed the post screw from the center post. Tapped the center post out from top, insulator stayed inside - good thing cause it is a bugger to get the insulator off the center post. Cut a groove in the center post with Dremel - not neat at all, but works. Some pics:
Before operation
Groove done and center post re-inserted
Top of groove visible
Dual coils, 28g, 10 wraps on a 1.6 mm mandrel, 0.8 ohms
Lighting up nicely
Ceramic wicking
Juice fountain
Well saturated. Like the edge around the deck, creating a little dam for juice. Drains well.
We have current.
Cap with air flow control on. Big compared to the Cyclone with afc. Vapes like a dream.
Thanks, it is a hit and miss affair with me. Wished I could drill it out - just looks so much neater, but function wise probably the same.Go Oom @Andre for a self proclaimed non diy guy you doing very well. I'm impressed sir.
QUASAR modded to bottom fed.
I reckon it would be a bit better can get a bigger channel and better flow from slitting it in my humble opinion.Thanks, it is a hit and miss affair with me. Wished I could drill it out - just looks so much neater, but function wise probably the same.
Sounds like a winner website right there!