New Counterfeit Vtc5 Batteries

Alex

Reonaut
Administrator
ECIGSSA Donor
VIP
LV
40
 
Joined
23/3/14
Posts
8,411
Awards
42
Age
55
Location
Benoni
http://www.illumn.com

Hey guys,
I am sad to announce that we have recently been a victim of counterfeit batteries. Fortunately we caught the problem very early and released a total of ~130 cells. We have isolated the exact customers that the batteries have been sent to and if you did not receive an email you do not have to worry. The counterfeit batteries are limited to orders shipped on 8/1-8/4. This PSA is to inform members of the vape community of a new kind of counterfeit battery that actually performs similarly to VTC5s during initial testing. This is dangerous because it's hard to determine their authenticity without testing equipment and existing data on authentic cells. As far as fakes come these have been the most realistic with a rewrap of what we highly suspect to be Samsung 25R cells which are supposed to be 20A continuous capable cells. While the Samsung 25R is definitely a capable cell we are unsure of it's longterm performance and battery longevity if discharged at 30A instead of 20A. I have enclosed the exact email I have sent to our customers who received the fake batteries below. I apologize again to all our customers for the error and hope to inform the community about these new fakes. This problem is not limited to a single supplier since we have two shipments of the same kind of fake VTC5s from two completely different suppliers. This indicates that the problem is higher up the supply chain most likely at a larger distributor. I would like to reiterate again that if you did NOT receive an email and have purchased from us previously that you have authentic cells. Detailed graphs with high resolution images have been attached in an imgur album.
Again on behalf of Illumn/Illumination Supply I deeply apologize for the mistake and inconvenience and we will do everything to make this right.
.
.
.
.
To Whom it May Concern:
You are receiving this email because a recent batch of Sony VTC5s we received passed our initial test inspection systems but were ultimately found to be counterfeit. Our first priority is to ensure the safety of our end users and advise to pull the VTC5s from retail if you are a wholesale customer. You have the option of a complete refund no questions asked from this batch of VTC5s or you can opt to wait for a confirmed authentic restock (no ETA at this time) with no need to return the counterfeit cells. We have determined that the counterfeit VTC5s are actually re-wrapped Samsung 25Rs which are rated for 20A discharge and 2500mAh capacity. We have received a total of 2 separate shipments from different suppliers of this new kind of counterfeit cell, please be warned that their performance is very similar to VTC5s and would not be that noticeable without testing equipment, if you do choose to purchase VTC5s from a different supplier than Illumn/Illumination Supply be aware of this unique counterfeit that is on the market now as it has fooled several different suppliers as well. We apologize deeply for the mistake and will continue improve our testing process to ensure it never happens again.
If you are curious about the results of our battery test they can be seen below. The best fit line for the counterfeit VTC5s match closely with Samsung 25Rs and are extremely likely to be 25Rs. Our original 35A continuous test showed the counterfeits outperforming the authentic VTC5s for the first portion of the continuous test and passed our original assessment. Further investigation pointed towards the Samsung 25R as the actual internal cell which are only rated for 20A due to heat production at higher amp ratings. Consulting the datasheet for the Samsung 25R and our test data, we conclude that it is not suitable for a 30A continuous discharge due to heat generated and possible cell longevity issues. In terms of pulse use (which is what the majority of vaping would be considered), the Samsung 25Rs are capable of 30A pulses for durations of 6 seconds.


By matching the counterfeit cells with known test data of other batteries in our inventory, we highly suspect the cell is a re-wrapped Samsung 25R by the overlapping brown and black lines in this graph.

wJak6eU.png


Initially the fake VTC5s outperform the VTC5s in voltage drop during the first part of the test but drop off later. Again the fake VTC5 matches very closely to the Samsung 25R



DnJHblA.png



rPU8wnv.jpg


UEuXeKc.jpg

XoARTIi.jpg

Battery negatives are identical
uJnzyCr.jpg
 
Sheez heavy days!! But also, wow, that is great customer service!!! :rock: hats off to them
 
Last edited:
This is why i'm scared of bringing in VTC5's etc. Look how closely they are replicated. Its a big risk for retailers.
 
This daily shite we deal with in the electronic industry and it is not just limited to batteries - here's a pic of a R75 capacitor faked:

FakeCapacitor1.jpg
 
The misleading claims on Efests concerns me more because they come directly from the manufacturer.
Where did you buy your VTCs @Gazzacpt?
Mine from VapeMob also looks ok.
 
The misleading claims on Efests concerns me more because they come directly from the manufacturer.
Where did you buy your VTCs @Gazzacpt?
Mine from VapeMob also looks ok.
I was very fortunate and got gifted them by a few guys doing a group by from the states. I have the nicest friends.
 
i ordered 3 VTC 5's from Vapemob

@Chop007 , i recall you saying that your VTC5's were confirmed as being legit. Correct?
 
i had wondered about this - the supply chains, and the potential for dishonesty and assumptions and so on:

This problem is not limited to a single supplier since we have two shipments of the same kind of fake VTC5s from two completely different suppliers. This indicates that the problem is higher up the supply chain most likely at a larger distributor.

Something puzzles me...i had not thought about the supply chains (why would i?) Then, a few weeks ago when ordered 2 from mtbaker and it turned out that they were out of stock, and i had to either take a store credit or get the order changed to add other items to the value of $22, i asked whether they had any idea when they would get more. They said they were waiting for a big batch from Sony. That was interesting, that they get them direct from Sony - it would mean the Sony USA distributor. i think that means you can be sure they really are genuine Sony VTC5's.

i've looked at other sellers; some say "genuine" or "authentic" and some do not. i sort of assume that when they don't say it, they are not genuine. And even before reading this, i'd wondered about how sure they are - the ones that say "authentic" - of what they are getting.
So, i thought it better to wait for mtbaker. Then i noticed that fasttech had "Authentic Sony VTC5" listed. So i thought, ok, fasttech says "Authentic" when the item is authentic and when they don't say it, you can assume it's not, and sometimes they say "XYZ style clearomizer" or whatever. And fasttech are big - very big, and they have...uhh, relationships with distributors and manufacturers, so i suppose they would get them directly from the Sony distributor. So it seems to me they're a good bet.

Meanwhile, today, i got an email from fasttech, saw the subject line is something about order update, assumed it was the notification that an order had been shipped...but when i opened it later, to see which order it is, it turned out to be a message from a customer service person,... [i do prefer copy-paste]...

We got official notification from Philippines post that they will suspend shipping external battery via airmail. This shipping method is unavailable in checkout page now.
Currently there is only registered surface mail via Hong Kong post is available for shipping external battery. The transit time is 45 to 60 days typical.
As there are external batteries in your order and you have selected Philippines Post before, we have shipped your order via registered surface mail via Hong Kong post instead; new tracking number has been updated. Shipping time is a little longer than Philippines Post, but it’s safer to ship external batteries in this way.
Sorry for unable to send external battery via the original shipping method you chose, your understanding will be highly appreciated.

Kind regards,
Jessica
Customer Advocate

:-( :-( :-( :-( :-(

45 days :-( to 60 days :-( ...surface mail - real "snail mail". ...ohhhh. So now i give up. i can continue indefinitely with the Efest 3100 in the HANA, use the MVP while i charge the Efest - which takes only about 70 to 80 minutes.....but i need a battery for the new VANILLA mod...i think i'll look for the next best - Samsung or LG or whatever; i'll have to go back to those cpf threads. .....At least then i'll know what i'm getting...maybe. Or another Efest. See what fasttech... oh :think: no, i'd end up with the same post problem. ...
 
@Cat seems for us sub-ohm vapors this warning becomes relevant with all the fakes running wild:

OhmSign.png
 
i ordered 3 VTC 5's from Vapemob

@Chop007 , i recall you saying that your VTC5's were confirmed as being legit. Correct?

I also ordered 2 VTC5's a while back from VapeMob, they do indeed seem to be legit - checked the gap on top. Honestly, I would be very surprised if these fakes slipped past them
 
I also ordered 2 VTC5's a while back from VapeMob, they do indeed seem to be legit - checked the gap on top. Honestly, I would be very surprised if these fakes slipped past them
I'm not sure if you've used any of the Efest purple 3100 but if you have, would you care to share your thoughts on them vs the Vtc5
 
I'm not sure if you've used any of the Efest purple 3100 but if you have, would you care to share your thoughts on them vs the Vtc5

Personally I don't own or have used the 3100Mah Purple EFest 18650's (I own and use the 2500MaH Purples on a daily basis) - but have done some research on them and here is what I take away from them vs the Sony VTC5s:

Sony VTC5 vs 3100Mah Purple EFest 18650

1) Maximum Safe Continuous Discharge Level: 30Amp vs 10Amp - Sony wins here for sure, however I feel 10Amps is sufficient depending on your vaping needs. Never intend to build below 0.6Ohm? Then these EFests are perfectly suitable

2) Battery capacity: 2600MaH vs 3100MaH - It really depends on your needs here, running a higher resistance coil? Then the EFest wins out, however you do not get the same capable ohm range with them vs the VTC5s; which means you can use that power on the VTC5s in situations where the EFest cannot hope to compete. Therefore, I would still argue that even though the VTC5s have a lower capacity, the power it does deliver is more accessible

3) Battery life and longevity: I'm not 100% sure on this point, some more research is needed. However, what I can say is that in general, if you want your batteries to last longer; make sure to charge them as soon as they dip below 3.2V under load (this is just a suggestion, but multiple battery manufacturers recommend this as well)

So the take away: These are 2 different types of batteries suited for different purposes imo. Get VTC5s if you want the freedom to do very low Ohm builds safely, otherwise if you are not interested in super sub-ohmage; then the EFests will suit you just fine :D
 
Personally I don't own or have used the 3100Mah Purple EFest 18650's (I own and use the 2500MaH Purples on a daily basis) - but have done some research on them and here is what I take away from them vs the Sony VTC5s:

Sony VTC5 vs 3100Mah Purple EFest 18650

1) Maximum Safe Continuous Discharge Level: 30Amp vs 10Amp - Sony wins here for sure, however I feel 10Amps is sufficient depending on your vaping needs. Never intend to build below 0.6Ohm? Then these EFests are perfectly suitable

2) Battery capacity: 2600MaH vs 3100MaH - It really depends on your needs here, running a higher resistance coil? Then the EFest wins out, however you do not get the same capable ohm range with them vs the VTC5s; which means you can use that power on the VTC5s in situations where the EFest cannot hope to compete. Therefore, I would still argue that even though the VTC5s have a lower capacity, the power it does deliver is more accessible

3) Battery life and longevity: I'm not 100% sure on this point, some more research is needed. However, what I can say is that in general, if you want your batteries to last longer; make sure to charge them as soon as they dip below 3.2V under load (this is just a suggestion, but multiple battery manufacturers recommend this as well)

So the take away: These are 2 different types of batteries suited for different purposes imo. Get VTC5s if you want the freedom to do very low Ohm builds safely, otherwise if you are not interested in super sub-ohmage; then the EFests will suit you just fine :D
They need to make a battery guru badge for you guy, seriously :p

I want to have the ability to jump around with coil resistance and to feel confident in the battery when vaping at lower resistances.
 
Personally I don't own or have used the 3100Mah Purple EFest 18650's (I own and use the 2500MaH Purples on a daily basis) - but have done some research on them and here is what I take away from them vs the Sony VTC5s:

Sony VTC5 vs 3100Mah Purple EFest 18650

1) Maximum Safe Continuous Discharge Level: 30Amp vs 10Amp - Sony wins here for sure, however I feel 10Amps is sufficient depending on your vaping needs. Never intend to build below 0.6Ohm? Then these EFests are perfectly suitable

2) Battery capacity: 2600MaH vs 3100MaH - It really depends on your needs here, running a higher resistance coil? Then the EFest wins out, however you do not get the same capable ohm range with them vs the VTC5s; which means you can use that power on the VTC5s in situations where the EFest cannot hope to compete. Therefore, I would still argue that even though the VTC5s have a lower capacity, the power it does deliver is more accessible

3) Battery life and longevity: I'm not 100% sure on this point, some more research is needed. However, what I can say is that in general, if you want your batteries to last longer; make sure to charge them as soon as they dip below 3.2V under load (this is just a suggestion, but multiple battery manufacturers recommend this as well)

So the take away: These are 2 different types of batteries suited for different purposes imo. Get VTC5s if you want the freedom to do very low Ohm builds safely, otherwise if you are not interested in super sub-ohmage; then the EFests will suit you just fine :D
The 3100mah is actually a rewrapped panasonic with a 4A continuous current limit and 6A pulse limit. Where Efest got 20A from we still trying to figure out.
 
The 3100mah is actually a rewrapped panasonic with a 4A continuous current limit and 6A pulse limit. Where Efest got 20A from we still trying to figure out.
Some new information on this thread. Personally I think the 3100 batt is good above 0.8 ohms.
 
The 3100mah is actually a rewrapped panasonic with a 4A continuous current limit and 6A pulse limit. Where Efest got 20A from we still trying to figure out.

That's even worse news then - not much better than the 3Amp CDC rating of the original Vision Spinner batteries :confused: Why? It just baffles me, makes no sense at all

To those that do not know and are considering buying these (EFest 3100MaH Purple) - read this article and decide for yourself (personally, I wouldn't get these now. EFest is saying one thing but the unwrapped item proves another): https://translate.google.com/transl...ion-ces-batteries-sont-dangereuses/&sandbox=1
 
Back
Top