Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
this is going to make for an interesting debate..
Oscar Pistorius sentenced 5 years for culpable homicide.
Have at it...
Apparently 10month in prison and the rest house arrest. Seriously WT........this is going to make for an interesting debate..
Oscar Pistorius sentenced 5 years for culpable homicide.
Have at it...
Thanks for that, seeing that news24.com doesn't seem to be able to handle the traffic at the moment.....this is going to make for an interesting debate..
Oscar Pistorius sentenced 5 years for culpable homicide.
Have at it...
I totally agree. Hopefully the courts have learnt their lesson in opening up the courtroom in this way.I am soo dissapointed in the way the law was applied, the extent of discretion the judge used and the mokery that was made of court rules and procedures. Im not saying oscar is innocent or that he is guilty. The public will never know what actually happened as there were no eye witnesses. But regardless of the crime he committed in wich there is no argument, it was televised for the last 20 months. The Constitution was preached and referenced every day...so then what happened to equality, dignity, privacy and a fair trial. In "fairness" why is the shrei dewani trial not televised then? I personally beleive at the end of the day a crime was committed and a life lost, therefore the punishment should fit the crime, but not for the whole world to pick at for 20months against one person....other criminals arent subjected to the same humiliation. Just my opinion in this whole thing. I dont expect anyone to agree, love to hear other views
I am soo dissapointed in the way the law was applied, the extent of discretion the judge used and the mokery that was made of court rules and procedures. Im not saying oscar is innocent or that he is guilty. The public will never know what actually happened as there were no eye witnesses. But regardless of the crime he committed in wich there is no argument, it was televised for the last 20 months. The Constitution was preached and referenced every day...so then what happened to equality, dignity, privacy and a fair trial. In "fairness" why is the shrei dewani trial not televised then? I personally beleive at the end of the day a crime was committed and a life lost, therefore the punishment should fit the crime, but not for the whole world to pick at for 20months against one person....other criminals arent subjected to the same humiliation. Just my opinion in this whole thing. I dont expect anyone to agree, love to hear other views
I completely agree. More weight in making a decision was based on the interest of society and not enough appreciation was given to the circumstances of the victim or circumstances of the accused. The court indirectly allowed the media to judge the outcome.I agree. This should not have been a public matter. Should not have been televised. Of all the charges against him and the serious nature of them all this is the outcome. Does the punishment fit the crime? If this was dealt with behind closed doors I'm pretty sure that public opinion would not have been a factor which in my opinion was a factor. But i feel the most for her parents. This just have been a long 20 months for them. Being constantly reminded of their loss. So sad
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
I completely agree. More weight in making a decision was based on the interest of society and not enough appreciation was given to the circumstances of the victim or circumstances of the accused. The court indirectly allowed the media to judge the outcome.
Conversations Definitely took place behind closed doors to reach
This outcome
The problem I forsee comming out of this trial is the precedent the national prosecuting authority has set. The next few months will be very interesting in criminal trials regarding murders, assualt gbh and culpable homicide. This case has gone against previous cases with very similar facts in terms of sentencing.
Couldn't Lol typoI wouldn't agree more with both your previous statements
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
The most shocking statement I geard through this whole trial, was when the expert evidence was given by the female witness in sentencing ( cant remember her name ). She said that in prison oscar would be vulnerable and unable to protect himself. In wich nel replied and said that condoms were available in prison and he asked her if she was opposed to homosexual relations.... how was that ever allowed to stand in court.