Here is the email my manager sends to me:
"Please can you refrain from “smoking” (vaping) in the buildings, especially in the design/planning office. Although there are no proper guidelines to deal with this, it must be treated in the same way as normal cigarette smoking until senior management come up with a policy about e-cigarettes."
And my reply (out of annoyance)
"I will oblige, however a little about vaping:
I humbly ask that most articles about "the dangers of vaping" should not be taken at face value as a lot of these articles include research and studies done by companies in the pharmacutical and tobacco industries. There are half truths noted in these studies. One example: vaping is as harmful as a cigarette to the user (vaping is carcinogenic). Yes, this is correct, but in reality, for it to become carcinogenic to this extent, the atomiser will require so much of power that the taste becomes burnt and horrible, and cannot be inhaled - that’s if the wicking material doesn’t burn away first.
The contents of eliquid include Properlyne Glycol and Vegitable Glycerin - PG for example is used in hospital air-conditioning as a method of purifying the air.
Part of the heavy regulations of regular cigarettes stem from its carcinogenic properties, which effects primary and secondary inhalers, as is the fire risk.
Atomisers produce "smoke" (correctly water vapour) that simulate cigarrettes, and a fragrance - but in reality, the fragrance is not of burning tobacco or any foul smell. Eliquid flavours are generally fruit or dessert , menthol, etc. and these are the fragrances that fill the air, much like perfumes and food does. How could anyone take offense to the smell of a chocolate? I find some perfumes and heat bags that have a more offensive fragrance.
I would be happy to gather facts and info about vaping if needed."
So anyways, what are the office policies regarding vaping in you guys workplaces?
"Please can you refrain from “smoking” (vaping) in the buildings, especially in the design/planning office. Although there are no proper guidelines to deal with this, it must be treated in the same way as normal cigarette smoking until senior management come up with a policy about e-cigarettes."
And my reply (out of annoyance)
"I will oblige, however a little about vaping:
I humbly ask that most articles about "the dangers of vaping" should not be taken at face value as a lot of these articles include research and studies done by companies in the pharmacutical and tobacco industries. There are half truths noted in these studies. One example: vaping is as harmful as a cigarette to the user (vaping is carcinogenic). Yes, this is correct, but in reality, for it to become carcinogenic to this extent, the atomiser will require so much of power that the taste becomes burnt and horrible, and cannot be inhaled - that’s if the wicking material doesn’t burn away first.
The contents of eliquid include Properlyne Glycol and Vegitable Glycerin - PG for example is used in hospital air-conditioning as a method of purifying the air.
Part of the heavy regulations of regular cigarettes stem from its carcinogenic properties, which effects primary and secondary inhalers, as is the fire risk.
Atomisers produce "smoke" (correctly water vapour) that simulate cigarrettes, and a fragrance - but in reality, the fragrance is not of burning tobacco or any foul smell. Eliquid flavours are generally fruit or dessert , menthol, etc. and these are the fragrances that fill the air, much like perfumes and food does. How could anyone take offense to the smell of a chocolate? I find some perfumes and heat bags that have a more offensive fragrance.
I would be happy to gather facts and info about vaping if needed."
So anyways, what are the office policies regarding vaping in you guys workplaces?