The MVP3 has Landed!
- Thread starter Rob Fisher
- Start date
I does look nice actually.
Well done Innokin. Looks like they're not making the same mistakes as many - was it too much to ask to put the charging doc in the side. I would rather my mod's be 2mm longer and have the input there.
Hope the rest finally get that!
Well done Innokin. Looks like they're not making the same mistakes as many - was it too much to ask to put the charging doc in the side. I would rather my mod's be 2mm longer and have the input there.
Hope the rest finally get that!
Wow, is that what the MVP 3 looks like? Its stunning!!! I want one, were can I get one?!?!
Todd got one in Vape Mail today!
Looks like Innokin made some improvements to the MVP 2.0 both function and look wise would be pretty epic if they decided to make the vw in the 50 + range. They are really taking the product in the right direction.
I wonder if it has what it takes to dethrone your mighty MVP 1
Lol @Yiannaki - i don't think my MVP2 is up for "dethroning"
It powers the Evod1 at 7.5 Watts for a relaxing vape of some mentholated fruity juices - and has enormous battery life, feels good in the hand and is rugged and still going about a year later without a single hassle. So I likely will just continue with it as is!
Maybe the MVP3 will have to serve another need altogether - just need to find that need first - LOL
Here's the specs straight from the Innokin website
3.0 – 9.0 volts adjustable in 0.1 volt increments
6.0 – 30.0 Watts, adjustable in 0.5 watts increments (I was hoping for 50.0)
0.4 to 2.5 ohms resistance
Passthrough with micro-USB
Link: http://www.innokin.com/index.php/en/product-listings-en/itaste-en/itaste-mvp-3-0
3.0 – 9.0 volts adjustable in 0.1 volt increments
6.0 – 30.0 Watts, adjustable in 0.5 watts increments (I was hoping for 50.0)
0.4 to 2.5 ohms resistance
Passthrough with micro-USB
Link: http://www.innokin.com/index.php/en/product-listings-en/itaste-en/itaste-mvp-3-0
IndoorSmokers review of the MVP 3!
I WANT ONE!!! Who can get me one!! No I dont want one... MY LIFE DEPENDS ON GETTING ONE!!!
Quickly!!
I'm dying here
Quickly!!
I'm dying here
Thanks for posting these @Rob Fisher
You are a star!
The slideshow was super
Am watching PBusardo now and will summarise after!
Yippee - the MVP3 is here - i hope its good
You are a star!
The slideshow was super
Am watching PBusardo now and will summarise after!
Yippee - the MVP3 is here - i hope its good
I watched the PBusardo review. As always he is very thorough and his comments are useful.
I will try summarise the main points as I saw it.
The main features
- fires down to 0.4 ohm - so great for most commercial kit and rebuildable needs
- 30W - enough for most day to day vaping. No cloud blowing comps though
- 3800 mah batt (vs 2600 mah in the MVP2) - great batt life. Phil got 3 days on 1.4 ohms at 13Watts
Phil likes the new conventional button position. I suppose its good but I quite liked the unique positioning on the old MVP2 where the side of my thumb fell naturally on it.
Size looks good. Only a bit bigger than the mVP2. I think it will be comfortable in the hand.
I actually dont like the built in additional output charge cable. It may be useful but i have never used my MVP to charge my other devices. It looks a bit flimsy to me and too short and looks like it may deteriorate over time. And its part of the bottom of the device. I dont like it. Lol, they probably put it in because Phil said thats what the previous one lacked. But i think this is a vaping device not a charging device. And it still has the other output power USB port. Heck, thats two outputs if I am understanding it correctly.
Glad they kept the Puff counter. I love the puff counter and use it as a "battery meter". Thats an awesome useful feature for me.
Ok, now for the important part - Phils testing on the scope
Flat signal - YAY. Not PWM. Thats what i love the most about the mVP2. It just feels great vaping on it. I think this one will feel the same. And it has proper step down functionality so when you fire at low wattages it fires at that low wattage.
But
He noticed a 0.4 second ramp up time to the setting you have chosen (on the scope). He didnt notice it while vaping but he says this is not something he has seen before. He thinks some vapers may be able to feel a difference and it may feel "anaemic". This worries me a bit.
Overall, i think this is going to be a solid and good device
But i noticed he didnt seem too excited about the device. He liked it but wasnt overjoyed. To me this seems more of an evolution than revolution.
Maybe its that my vaping has developed so much since the MVP2 that I dont find this overly exciting either. I may be wrong, but I dont think the MVP3 will achieve th cult status of the MVP2. Times have changed.
That said, I will probably still get one just to have it for my Evod1 (Lol) but I am not in a rush
I will try summarise the main points as I saw it.
The main features
- fires down to 0.4 ohm - so great for most commercial kit and rebuildable needs
- 30W - enough for most day to day vaping. No cloud blowing comps though
- 3800 mah batt (vs 2600 mah in the MVP2) - great batt life. Phil got 3 days on 1.4 ohms at 13Watts
Phil likes the new conventional button position. I suppose its good but I quite liked the unique positioning on the old MVP2 where the side of my thumb fell naturally on it.
Size looks good. Only a bit bigger than the mVP2. I think it will be comfortable in the hand.
I actually dont like the built in additional output charge cable. It may be useful but i have never used my MVP to charge my other devices. It looks a bit flimsy to me and too short and looks like it may deteriorate over time. And its part of the bottom of the device. I dont like it. Lol, they probably put it in because Phil said thats what the previous one lacked. But i think this is a vaping device not a charging device. And it still has the other output power USB port. Heck, thats two outputs if I am understanding it correctly.
Glad they kept the Puff counter. I love the puff counter and use it as a "battery meter". Thats an awesome useful feature for me.
Ok, now for the important part - Phils testing on the scope
Flat signal - YAY. Not PWM. Thats what i love the most about the mVP2. It just feels great vaping on it. I think this one will feel the same. And it has proper step down functionality so when you fire at low wattages it fires at that low wattage.
But
He noticed a 0.4 second ramp up time to the setting you have chosen (on the scope). He didnt notice it while vaping but he says this is not something he has seen before. He thinks some vapers may be able to feel a difference and it may feel "anaemic". This worries me a bit.
Overall, i think this is going to be a solid and good device
But i noticed he didnt seem too excited about the device. He liked it but wasnt overjoyed. To me this seems more of an evolution than revolution.
Maybe its that my vaping has developed so much since the MVP2 that I dont find this overly exciting either. I may be wrong, but I dont think the MVP3 will achieve th cult status of the MVP2. Times have changed.
That said, I will probably still get one just to have it for my Evod1 (Lol) but I am not in a rush
Last edited:
Thanks for the summary @Silver...I really wasn't in the mood for PB tonight and you saved me
It does sound like it is exactly what it should be, even though it won't be what many people want I think they did the right thing by evolving it instead of creating something completely different. It's basically an MVP to match where the market is at right now
I think this product fills a very specific hole in the market and I'm sure it will be successful, but maybe a little less so than the previous versions since the market is quite crowded in this space now (especially with the iStick 50W inbound). All in all I think they did good
It does sound like it is exactly what it should be, even though it won't be what many people want I think they did the right thing by evolving it instead of creating something completely different. It's basically an MVP to match where the market is at right now
I think this product fills a very specific hole in the market and I'm sure it will be successful, but maybe a little less so than the previous versions since the market is quite crowded in this space now (especially with the iStick 50W inbound). All in all I think they did good
Similar threads
