I have just watched the previously posted Youtube review and find his findings for the 0.25ohm coil flawed as 100 hertz is not suitable for that coil head as explained in @fbb1964's post!
To get a better prospective and to make it more balanced here is the findings cropped from the previously posted graphic for the 0.65ohm coil which shows a much greater difference!
Even here if he had the frequency set at between 70 to 75 hertz he would of had even better results and this is without using refresh which adds to coil life even further!
To get a better prospective and to make it more balanced here is the findings cropped from the previously posted graphic for the 0.65ohm coil which shows a much greater difference!
Even here if he had the frequency set at between 70 to 75 hertz he would of had even better results and this is without using refresh which adds to coil life even further!
Last edited:
