On fastech they say made from 316 but who knows if thats true or not.
Some clones say 1:1 and they sure as hell are not
Which is my point
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
On fastech they say made from 316 but who knows if thats true or not.
Some clones say 1:1 and they sure as hell are not
Why didnt we buy those crappy pall mall cigs instead of Marlbro, Peter S etc...
...I used to smoke Pall Malls...
And you still alive brother....... HOW?
Years of training.
Started on the Stuyvies, hopped brands like mad before settling on Marlboros and switched to Princeton when the Marlboros became too expensive.
And even after all that, STILL managed to pull a Silver with a Twisp Clearo!
But all's well that ends well - March 13 marks a year off the stinkies!
I'm well aware of the differences of 316 and 304 but how does one know the clone is made out 316 a part from be told by FT, 3fvape , ect?
Or are we assuming china uses the best materials when making clones
Ok I see what this is about for you, "I paid a lot more than you so it must be lies". Look I don't know if it is truly 316 or not, but I find the knee jerk reactions both amusing and expected. You guys paid A LOT for your OL16's..
lol okay bud Fastech must be telling the truth. Luckily we have you too show us the 'light'
Peace
I feel it can be hit or miss with clones. I 've bought ones that are good quality and could pass the "Pepsi"challenge,but have also gotten utter pieces of crap.However it is nice when you get lucky and find that really good one that preforms and is a quality product at a fraction of the cost.Ilke anything else you need to do your homework.Some reviewers do comparisons between clones and authentic gear and between different clones themselves.Geeky Vapes is a great site that comes to mind in this regard.With all the chatter about cloning and reverse engineering I thought it best to bring up the ever present uneasy topic of clones. Not what the topic is about at all whole different ball game in my eyes (watch The Island of Dr Moreau)....
What this is about is the ever present pretense of 'aurhentic' vs 'cloned' hardware.
Here's a challenge... I challenge any stalwart to be blind folded and distinguish between an authentic and a clone atty. Be it a RDA(T)(whatever). Yes everyone wants to crucify the cloners but at the end of the day if I get the same vaping experience from a cloned whatever will it not urge me to try the 'real deal'?
I'm not condoning cloning don't get me wrong but does the price tag of authentics really make it worth while?
Hi @DoubleD,
I don't mind a 'disagree' rating, we can't all agree, but I took it you re-read my statement where I said "apparently". It is something I caught on another forum and not entirely my view as I'm no SS expert, but it does seem to be valid in a sense.
So I'll tell you more. According to the post, and it looks to be accurate, the Authentic OL16 is made from 304 Stainless Steel. The clone is made from 316 Stainless Steel.
The difference: http://www.reliance-foundry.com/blog/304-vs-316-stainless-steel#gref
"It has almost the same physical and mechanical properties as 304 stainless steel and contains a similar material make-up. The difference is that 316 stainless steel incorporates about 2 to 3 percent molybdenum, which increases corrosion resistance—particularly against chlorides and other industrial solvents."
"The difference between 304 and 316 stainless steel is the presence of molybdenum, which provides a much higher degree of corrosion resistance -"
Which seems to indicate 316 SS could be considered a superior material to 304 SS.
I thought it's interesting since it is something that is often brought up when criticising clones ("inferior materials are used"). Now I'll agree the overall quality of machining on the clone is inferior to the authentic, but this does seem to indicate that the clone is superior in at least one way to the authentic.
Thats exactly the gif I thought of hahahahahaha nice
Ok I see what this is about for you, "I paid a lot more than you so it must be lies". Look I don't know if it is truly 316 or not, but I find the knee jerk reactions both amusing and expected. You guys paid A LOT for your OL16's..
This argument is flawed to say the least.
I have been running an OL16 for 10 months as my daily vape often going through 30ml+ a day and it still looks and performs like the day I bought it. No rust, no dark spots. No discolouration whatsoever. Also still using the same o rings.
I challenge anyone with a clone Ol16 to send it to me so I can test it for 10 months. Parallel tests produce results and facts. Not speculation.
On the point that we paid to much this is relative if you consider that I will run the atty for another few years daily.
Too expensive is relative when you look at ROI. In all honesty it probably works out cheaper in the long run for me anyways.
If you want new gear every month then great. Go for clones and whatever is affordable.
I'm not in the habit of changing setups regularly.
Whatever floats your goat.
I'll take that challenge if you take up my blind test challengeThis argument is flawed to say the least.
I have been running an OL16 for 10 months as my daily vape often going through 30ml+ a day and it still looks and performs like the day I bought it. No rust, no dark spots. No discolouration whatsoever. Also still using the same o rings.
I challenge anyone with a clone Ol16 to send it to me so I can test it for 10 months. Parallel tests produce results and facts. Not speculation.
On the point that we paid to much this is relative if you consider that I will run the atty for another few years daily.
Too expensive is relative when you look at ROI. In all honesty it probably works out cheaper in the long run for me anyways.
If you want new gear every month then great. Go for clones and whatever is affordable.
I'm not in the habit of changing setups regularly.
Whatever floats your goat.
Let's put this OL16 authentic "hate" to rest.I'll take that challenge if you take up my blind test challenge
Let's put this OL16 authentic "hate" to rest.
@Effjh, I would test the clone if I could get basic features to work but unfortunately the clone Ol16 can't even be coiled without posing a risk to myself on a mech.
The clone is crude in comparison with respect to machining and attention to detail like sharp edges etc but that's expected from a clone.
Unfortunately the clone fails to even make it onto a mod because coiling without loose wire is not possible.
One of these is a fake and the other an authentic.
The challenge is hard to accept when building on a clone that can't even clamp your wire. The screws have about a 1mm gap fully screwed in so it's hard to vape something that doesn't clamp wire.
Also the base of the post screws are not flat making clamping difficult.
Orings failed on the clone.
See if you can spot the difference.
View attachment 83840 View attachment 83841 View attachment 83842 View attachment 83843 View attachment 83844 View attachment 83845 View attachment 83846 View attachment 83847 View attachment 83848 View attachment 83849 View attachment 83850
I'm not one to review clones or any atty for that matter.
I have also refrained from saying the clone is garbage before but in light of this discussion the authentic is actually usable and thus making it the clear winner.
As I said before, you are free to buy the clone if you so wish but there is no need to bash an authentic or to bash what others are chosing to spend their hard earned cash on.