I have to disagree the twisp clearo was an awesome device in its time. We can't compare a 1994 vw chico to the now 2016 vw golf R.
Vape on peeps
I agree. The chico was better
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I have to disagree the twisp clearo was an awesome device in its time. We can't compare a 1994 vw chico to the now 2016 vw golf R.
Vape on peeps
u guys bring tears to my eyes, not in a joking way or a girl way. I help people, but you guys really help people. Sheesh I need to do more.
Like NO gear? REALLY? That will not fly. calling the PIF master, I have gear for this man. @shaunnadanAlthough i currently dont have expendable income/gear to take part in this beautiful movement, i have been able to educate smokers and non smokers on a daily basis at work (im a barber/hairdresser) with 6 confirmed successful conversions, I graciously tip my hat to the good work of everyone involved.
Although i currently dont have expendable income/gear to take part in this beautiful movement, i have been able to educate smokers and non smokers on a daily basis at work (im a barber/hairdresser) with 6 confirmed successful conversions, I graciously tip my hat to the good work of everyone involved.
I love the idea of Pif'ing - I have an old Twisp that I don't use.
Would Pif it to someone but those things are just shyte!
Don't want to put anyone off vapoing before they even began....
I have pif'd 4x twisp clearo's. Only 1 has carried on vaping, the rest all reverted back to smoking within the first few days because of issues with the clearo.
I sort of agree with you hehe, but...
But I would still pif more if I had, you are giving someone a chance to make a good change in their life, quality means nothing if its free. Its the thought that counts.
No spare gear what so ever, one mod, one RTA, 2 sets of batteries, charger and basic RBA supplies.Like NO gear? REALLY? That will not fly. calling the PIF master, I have gear for this man. @shaunnadan
Funnily enough I ended up getting a new coil clearomiser, gave the twisp a good make over. She looked like new again.I have pif'd 4x twisp clearo's. Only 1 has carried on vaping, the rest all reverted back to smoking within the first few days because of issues with the clearo.
I sort of agree with you hehe, but...
But I would still pif more if I had, you are giving someone a chance to make a good change in their life, quality means nothing if its free. Its the thought that counts.
In line of another thread that got slightly heated, is it worth bringing the pif rules back?
And is @shaunnadan still the pif admin?
Agreed. It was a bit concerning to see the open hostility towards the guy (yes, he clearly was a chancer and had some ludicrous audacity to ask for luxuries, nobody's arguing that). But that doesn't mean we have to treat that as an excuse to sling insults and hostility towards people. This is a public forum after all.Thanks @Silver .
Just think if the bloke could have been reffered to the right people that all could have been handled behind the scenes.
Agreed. It was a bit concerning to see the open hostility towards the guy (yes, he clearly was a chancer and had some ludicrous audacity to ask for luxuries, nobody's arguing that). But that doesn't mean we have to treat that as an excuse to sling insults and hostility towards people. This is a public forum after all.
Yip, don't get me wrong - I agree with the reasoning behind it 100%. I just think we need to reign ourselves in a bit and request a threadlock much, much sooner.On the other hand its also our responsibility to protect the forum and new users falling pray to these scammers/chancers. I think everyone got hot headed because he got good advise and a way to get what he wants and he brushed it of and continued with his plead for items he Wants.
I would like to see the PIF rules be more regulated in a sense that these one post wonders dont come here just to get free stuff.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yip, don't get me wrong - I agree with the reasoning behind it 100%. I just think we need to reign ourselves in a bit and request a threadlock much, much sooner.
Yip, don't get me wrong - I agree with the reasoning behind it 100%. I just think we need to reign ourselves in a bit and request a threadlock much, much sooner.
@Raindance ,I think that this is great advice, and I personally think that this is the correct way to go as well. This will stop all of us from blowing our tops because of what we perceive, and restrict communication to the pif master and the individual, a win win situation for all. The needs of the individual can then be ascertained and the correct help can be sent from individuals that can/want to assist. This will protect the forum as well as donators and requesters.I think we as members should redirect any and all PIF requests to the PIF master as soon as it appears, irrespective the circumstances.
Those wishing to contribute can then also communicate with the PIF master rather than the requester directly. I think locking the request thread as soon as referred would help us to stick to the principle.
My 2c...
Regards
True story. There are times when we should have an ice bucket on hand.
Sent by iDad's iPhone