Show us your side by side

[Stranger]

Manto pro with the Blitzen
Puma 220 with the Dvarw clone

Same ADV

The Blitzen being a dual coil with a single wire clapton 26/36 0.28 Ohms. 22.5W
The vapour production of this combo is instant and it is dense thick clouds. You can definitely taste the peppermint and menthol but the Koolada is muted a bit and not so cool on the throat. The AFC is closed down quite a bit with only 5-6 honeycomb holes showing either side.

The Dvarw clone is a single coil, my DIY Cotton bacon comp wire 26awg twisted. 0.35 Ohms 20W

I have the biggest air flow insert in this and the draw is non adjustable. Not as restricted as the Blitzen. Vapour production is thinner and not as dense. Flavours are more definable, I can pick up the 1% of spearmint in the mix. The Koolada is colder on the throat. Slightly more ramp up time and it gets warmer as you draw.

I am not doing this as a comparison as such, although it does read that way, as to which is better, both of them are betterer and I enjoy both at any time, but more as info as to the experience I am having with these combo's. They are both very good to me but does highlight how differing set ups will influence the same juice.

 

[Spyker41771]

View attachment 203183

Manto pro with the Blitzen
Puma 220 with the Dvarw clone

Same ADV

The Blitzen being a dual coil with a single wire clapton 26/36 0.28 Ohms. 22.5W
The vapour production of this combo is instant and it is dense thick clouds. You can definitely taste the peppermint and menthol but the Koolada is muted a bit and not so cool on the throat. The AFC is closed down quite a bit with only 5-6 honeycomb holes showing either side.

The Dvarw clone is a single coil, my DIY Cotton bacon comp wire 26awg twisted. 0.35 Ohms 20W

I have the biggest air flow insert in this and the draw is non adjustable. Not as restricted as the Blitzen. Vapour production is thinner and not as dense. Flavours are more definable, I can pick up the 1% of spearmint in the mix. The Koolada is colder on the throat. Slightly more ramp up time and it gets warmer as you draw.

I am not doing this as a comparison as such, although it does read that way, as to which is better, both of them are betterer and I enjoy both at any time, but more as info as to the experience I am having with these combo's. They are both very good to me but does highlight how differing set ups will influence the same juice.

Hey man

Not sure if you know but they made a straight glass for the blitzen in 4ml with the extension, for me it looks a hell of a lot better with the straight glass, but if you like the bubble on it just ignore my ramble

 

[Stranger]

Not at all, thanks for the heads up, and the pic, says a thousand words.

Wide bore tip, lots of air holes open. Tells me how you like to vape

 

[Spyker41771]

Not at all, thanks for the heads up, and the pic, says a thousand words.

Wide bore tip, lots of air holes open. Tells me how you like to vape

Well not really i like my vape bit restricted like on my intake dual, thing is cant find a nice drip tip that goes to the edge of the "lip" and dont like the std yellow one, the airflow on the blitzen i prefer open to hit the whole coil cause if you close of a section only hits some of the coil, well thats how i feel. So don't really like heavy airflow but for the flavor from the blitzen i will live with it.
All my other rta's i close the airflow about half.

Pic to show how i prefer airflow :



Sry for the sad state of the gen 3 but it my work mod ...
But look into the 4ml straight glass looks really nice.

Sry for the derail of the thread